Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Grok 4.6
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 90/100 | 79/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| Grok 4.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 39/100 | 26/100 | 74/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.4M
41K
Completed sessions
319,221,118
98,371
Token share
16.3%
0%
Tokens
215T+472%
39B-2%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.3%58K user-weeks
34.9%2.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6·Jamba Mini