Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Hy4 preview
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- Hy4 previewTencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 64/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Hy4 preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 40/100 | 87/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.22/ 1M
$0.83/ 1M
Output
$0.66/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.007/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.2M
47K
Completed sessions
17,999,818
116,209
Token share
4.14%
0.01%
Tokens
55T-81%
170B-21%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.3%88K user-weeks
48.5%1.1K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy4 preview vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 preview·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy4 preview vs Jamba MiniHy4 preview·Jamba Mini